Hi David. On Mon Dec 16 22:22:07 2013, David Roldán Martínez wrote: > I've seen the comments but I'm afraid my doubts is much more basic. ah :) > don't know what do the following lines mean: > 1 gatcctccat atacaacggt atctccacct caggtttaga tcaacaac ggaaccattg > 61 ccgacatgag acagttaggt atcgtcgaga gttacaagct aaaacgagca gtagtcagct > 121 ctgcatctga agccgctgaa gttctactaa gggtggataa catcatccgt gcaagaccaa > [...] > > What I see here is a number (that I guess related with the number of > bases cointained in each line: 60 bases/line) and 6 bases string that > I don't know if are sub-sequences o if they form part of the same > sequence. They all form part of the same sequence. Genbank records typically describe just one contiguous nucleotide sequence, along with lots of annotation (including genes/protein(s) that might be present, etc).
> I've taken a look at embl_mapping.xml and I think I understand how the > information is mapped but I still don't know how this applies to > GenBank files as the one I'm attaching. > > BTW, do you want me to incluide these comments on the issue or do you > prefer to use the list for discussion? Either comment on the bug or perhaps just email me directly - since your questions are more about understanding the semantics of the format. In fact, I think that it would be worth us skyping sometime this week. Would you be able to talk around 5-6pm your time tomorrow ? I'll have actually looked at your patch by then and will be able to give you some feedback. Jim. _______________________________________________ Jalview-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/jalview-dev
