Hi Mungo, and all. You (and Tochukwu) are ordering like: java javax org com jalview
I now realise I was the odd-one out. However, I do have strong opinions about this ordering, having jalview imports first will make things infinitely easier when we carve up the packages into separate OSGi modules. So may I respectfully ask that we put jalview packages at the top ? I'm happy for us to do this when we scrub the 2.9 code, rather than right now, to avoid unnecessary conflicts (until then, I'll use your ordering, Mungo). Jim. On 05/06/2015 11:46, Mungo Carstairs (Staff) wrote: > > Looks like we don't quite have consistency yet which will result in > unnecessary diffs with each commit. > > > I have this: > > <image removed> > > > Does that seem a reasonable ordering, if so can we all configure the same? > > _______________________________________________ Jalview-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/jalview-dev
