Can I attach documents to this list? I have bullet points for what is
needed in terms of Java preparation for J2S.

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 6:40 AM, Jim Procter <[email protected]>
wrote:

> OK. The perfect time is when all in-progress feature branches are merged
> (since develop currently has the other ordering), but if you want to
> switch now, then that's fine too.
>
> I guess I'll keep using the jalview on top ordering then !
> Jim
>
> On 11/06/2015 12:23, Charles Ofoegbu (Staff) wrote:
> > Same with me. Happy to switch anytime.
> >
> > Charles
> >
> >
> > Ofoegbu Tochukwu Charles
> > Jalview Visual Analytics Developer/Scientist
> > The Barton Group
> > Division of Computational Biology
> > College of Life Sciences
> > University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK.
> > Skype: cofoegbu
> > www.jalview.org <http://www.jalview.org/>
> > www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk <http://www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk/>​
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 11 Jun 2015, at 12:17 pm, Mungo Carstairs (Staff)
> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >> Happy to switch to
> >> jalview
> >> java
> >> javax
> >> org
> >> com
> >>
> >> Just say when we're ready to do so!
> >>
> >> mungo
> >>
> >> Mungo Carstairs
> >> Jalview Computational Scientist
> >> The Barton Group
> >> Division of Computational Biology
> >> College of Life Sciences
> >> University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK.
> >> www.jalview.org <http://www.jalview.org>
> >> www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk
> >>
> >> ________________________________________
> >> From: [email protected]
> >> <[email protected]> on behalf of Jim Procter
> >> <[email protected]>
> >> Sent: 11 June 2015 12:11
> >> To: Jalview Development List
> >> Subject: Re: [Jalview-dev] Import ordering in code
> >>
> >> Hi Mungo, and all.
> >>
> >> You (and Tochukwu) are ordering like:
> >> java
> >> javax
> >> org
> >> com
> >> jalview
> >>
> >> I now realise I was the odd-one out. However, I do have strong opinions
> >> about this ordering, having jalview imports first will make things
> >> infinitely easier when we carve up the packages into separate OSGi
> >> modules.
> >>
> >> So may I respectfully ask that we put jalview packages at the top ? I'm
> >> happy for us to do this when we scrub the 2.9 code, rather than right
> >> now, to avoid unnecessary conflicts (until then, I'll use your ordering,
> >> Mungo).
> >>
> >> Jim.
> >>
> >> On 05/06/2015 11:46, Mungo Carstairs (Staff) wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Looks like we don't quite have consistency yet which will result in
> >>> unnecessary diffs with each commit.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I have this:
> >>>
> >>> <image removed>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Does that seem a reasonable ordering, if so can we all configure the
> >>> same?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Jalview-dev mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/jalview-dev
> >>
> >> The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish Charity, No: SC015096
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Jalview-dev mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/jalview-dev
> >
> >
> > The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish Charity, No: SC015096
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jalview-dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/jalview-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jalview-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/jalview-dev
>



-- 
Robert M. Hanson
Larson-Anderson Professor of Chemistry
Chair, Department of Chemistry
St. Olaf College
Northfield, MN
http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr


If nature does not answer first what we want,
it is better to take what answer we get.

-- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900
_______________________________________________
Jalview-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/jalview-dev

Reply via email to