"Stanley,Michael P." wrote:
>
> Charles Benett wrote:
>
> > "Stanley,Michael P." wrote:
> >
> >> I have become very interested in your product, more so I am interested
> >> in helping with some development.
> >
> >
> > Ace!
> >
> >> I was planning on writing a decent
> >> listserve mailet.
> >
> >
> > You know there is one included? Feel free to improve it.
>
> We'll I will be using that as a starting point but I feel it really
> isn't a suitable alternative for other more mature mailling list engines
> (i.e. Mailman). I don't like using mailman and think that a good
> listserve and listserve manager is something the java oss community is
> missing. I would love to fill this gap. Hey, but its all about time ;-)
Cool.
>
> >
> >> I've been looking through the code of the last
> >> release and am finding it hard to follow. I look at the head of the cvs
> >> and I see significant changes and it appears you've started a push to
> >> the new Avalon Framework. My questions all pretty much relate to that
> >> push. How far along is the complete switch?
> >
> >
> > The code in cvs uses one of the beta releases of Avalon 4.0 and the
> > contemporaneous Phoenix and Cornerstone.
> > In other words the switch is conplete. Although we may not be using all
> > the features of Avalon.
>
> Yeah, I finally found some stuff on it. Some of it was right in front
> of my face (like cvs tag names) and other stuff was a little harder to
> come by (barried in the architecture document).
We need a new architecture doc that reflects Phoenix.
>
> >> What version of Avalon was
> >> used in the latest release? Can I get the source to the Avalon that was
> >> used in that release (I'm having a real hard time finding it through
> >> conventional CVS use, Avalon has changed a lot). What is the current
> >> roadmap planned for James? Should I begin my development with the
> >> stable release or should I start by using the <blank>?
> >
> >
> > I would strongly encourage you to work from cvs.
> > I've just posted instructions on getting avalon code behind the
> > (December) last release.
>
> I downloaded both the head of the cvs and the tag with-Avalon-4.0.02b
> (or something like that). Which one should I be using? The tagged one
> seems a little bit more cleaned up than the head. How do they compare
> on stability?
Head - there aren't any branches.
Charles
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
