Harmeet, >Their approach seems to be that SMTP is abused, let us compile a list of >servers that can be abused. In some sense it is a public service, but to me >it is a bit like, let us collect information on vulnerable machines by >exploiting the vulnerabilitues and then as a public service, publish the >list of machines. Seems like an odd approach, but maybe an effective one to >fight against spam. > Yes it is a controvercial way of gathing facts.
>I detected their probes on my mail server in January. Attaching the >conversation. You may find it interesting. > It is easy to see (lookng at that email) why they get in trouble, They are very evasive to simple questions from a concerned sysop. - Paul -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
