Hi, I am monitoring discussions here for a quite along time. > > There have been discussions about this, however the fact is that it works, > its stable, and if it ain't broke, don't fix it. > This doesn't mean that it can not work better, though :-). There is a consideration of consistency (this is what Avalon and frameworks basically about). I conclude that RemoteDelivery implementation is not consistent with Phoenix-Cornerstone in particular and Avalon framework in general.
> We've had a few discussions about the use of JavaMail, why would you think > we should not use it? Because this way we don't have control on how sockets are created. Try to implement SSL for present RemoteDelivery :-) Andrei -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
