> This doesn't mean that it can not work better, though :-). There is a > consideration of consistency (this is what Avalon and frameworks basically > about). I conclude that RemoteDelivery implementation is not > consistent with > Phoenix-Cornerstone in particular and Avalon framework in general. We'd be pleased to accept your kind offer to contribute... ;-D d. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- RE: Tomcat + James in a sing... mohan narayanaswamy
- Re: Tomcat + James in a single j... Michael Locasto
- Re: Tomcat + James in a sing... Paul Hammant
- Re: Tomcat + James in a sing... mohan narayanaswamy
- RE: Tomcat + James in a sing... Danny Angus
- RE: Tomcat + James in a sing... mohan narayanaswamy
- RE: Tomcat + James in a sing... Danny Angus
- Threads in James: Re: Tomcat... Andrei Ivanov
- RE: Threads in James: Re: To... Danny Angus
- Re: Threads in James: Re: To... Andrei Ivanov
- Re: Threads in James: Re: To... Danny Angus
- Re: Threads in James: Re: To... Andrei Ivanov
- Re: Threads in James: Re: To... Serge Knystautas
- RE: Threads in James: Re: To... Danny Angus
- Re: Threads in James: Re: To... Andrei Ivanov
- Re: Threads in James: Re: To... Serge Knystautas
- RE: Tomcat + James in a sing... Clinton Goudie
- RE: Tomcat + James in a sing... mohan narayanaswamy
- AW: Tomcat + James in a single jvm process Simon Klaiber
- Re: Tomcat + James in a single jvm process Paul Hammant