If there is an Apache option, I think we should take it in preference to non-Apache options. And the Avalon site looks very similar to Danny's Maven'd James site.
Charles Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > I would propose Apache Forrest instead... > The site would be updated automatically from CVS for you, and is > completely skinnable. > > Here is the last manually updated Forrest site: > http://xml.apache.org/forrest/ > > Here is the hourly updated from CVS Forrest site: > http://www.krysalis.org/forrest/ > > The Avalon site is done by a Forrest subsystem: > http://jakarta.apache.org/avalon/ > > > Danny Angus wrote: > >> Ok, >> >> The next question is should we use Maven to build the site..? >> I have used Maven to build a sample of the James site (didn't config >> all the >> developers) in my home dir, without changing any of the source of the >> docs, >> what do we think? >> >> http://jakarta.apache.org/~danny/ >> >> >> d. >> >> >> >>> Danny Angus wrote: >>> >>>> Let me clarify.. >>>> >>>> I think we should remove ant binaries from cvs, I'm totally cool with >>>> modifying & keeping the script, then "ant" or "build" will do the >>>> thing. >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> For additional commands, e-mail: >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
