I agree that having a common spool for SMTP and NNTP would require pretty
significant change. That is why I suggested that conceptually, the current
spool manager is really related to the smtpserver, and not an independent
entity.
--- Noel
-----Original Message-----
From: Harmeet Bedi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 14:19
To: James Developers List
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Server-wide default hello name
----- Original Message -----
From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Is that why the NNTP server has its own spool block, albeit
> pretty much empty?
NNTP doesn't share the same repository code. The main reason why I did it
that way was because I could not find a way to (a) stream messages and (b)
repository code did not seem stable.
Arriving at a uniform repository structure with (a)low memory, (b) low
processing overhead and (c) multi-process friendly would be awesome. But
doing that would mean one has to radically change the design for
processores, mailets etc.
Harmeet
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
