Danny,
> 1/ that Harmeet move the whole of o.a.j.testing (including the pre- > existing potocol tests) into a proposal or first sub-directory of jakarta- > james where it can be used to create an independantly distributable test > suite. +1 > 2/ that the scheduler/watchdog and service issues be defered until after > the release. -1 IMHO there is no point doing the release until this issue is addressed. This isn't a minor little problem. This is a core issues that affects every single service on the system. It causes them to crash disastrously under any serious load. There hasn't been a single coherent objection to the changes proposed other than "that's not the way it used to work". Every question has been answered, every issue addressed. If there are more serious questions/issues about the design/implementation let's hear them. If there's an objection other than "I don't see why we should change things", then let's hear it. If not, let's put the patch in and fix the outstanding problems. This is not a little game to me. I'm not interested in getting a beer from anyone - I want the server to work the way it should. > 3/ we move on with the release as planned. > > .. otherwise these will hold up what is regarded as being a much needed > release of the 2.1a1 code. One of the reasons it's much needed (as the recent dialogue on the James user list makes clear) is precisely the scheduler problem that we're addressing. Leaving it unaddressed only exacerbates the problem. --Peter -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
