thanks for looking this up. Do you have a search tool ? There are some
interesting thing the lucene folks are doing. Mail indexing facility may be
good to get from them. Does IMAP need indexing.
About ready to post code.
Check it out..
Harmeet
----- Original Message -----
From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 4:51 PM
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Removing Scheduler dependency, refactoring service code
> Minor correction. I went back and looked. The ORIGINAL identification of
> this problem was made by Steve Short and Shilpa Dalmia of PostX back in
> mid-May. They raised this issue on the the Avalon Developers list on May
> 17, and on the James Developers list three days later.
>
> And I quote Peter Donald:
>
> SS: Here is why we raised this as an issue. The Apache James mail server
> SS: project is using this timer mechanism to implement a connection
timeout
> on
> SS: the SMTP port. When it receives data on the the port, it calls
> SS: resetTrigger to resets the timer.
>
> PD: ouch it is not really designed for that!
>
> After reading through the related Avalon and James classes, I proposed a
> watchdog on May 21. I missed one thing in terms of the magnitude of
objects
> created, which Serge corrected, but he did note on May 22 that: "Looks
> rather serious... like you said, perhaps building our own trigger
mechanism
> is the way to go."
>
> Andrei Ivanov reported load test problems with James on May 30, and then
> submitted the first version of the re-factored classes on June 3,
reporting
> that he was able to successfully load test with the changes ("from 6req/s
> and crash -> 26req/s no crash").
>
> It was Andrei who did the basic re-factoring, including: "I replaced
> BaseConnectionHandler with AbstractServer which implements
> ConnectionHandlerFactory. Every other server class can now inherit from
new
> AbstractServer by implementing its 'public abstract
> createConnectionHandler()'." He re-submitted in late July when they still
> hadn't been committed (both Serge and Danny knew about them, but neither
had
> time to deal with them, as Danny apologized), and then again in
mid-August.
> At that point, Peter said that he'd take care of picking up Andrei's code,
> re-doing all of the services to use it (Andrei had only done SMTP), and
> hoped to have it in the code base about a week later. Unfortunately,
Peter
> got side tracked on all sorts of other Committer responsibilities (e.g.,
> testing and committing other fixes that needed to be done), but this
change
> is finally ready for the CVS.
>
> That pretty much covers the long history of these two change areas.
>
> --- Noel
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
