> It's a basically three line change to change the current code to allow
> re-authentication (rather than returning a 482, the user, pass, and
> isAlreadyAuthenticated values get wiped). I don't really care - so long
> as the other behavior (handling double USER submission, out of order,
> double PASSWORD) is there.
>From the look of Harmeet's initial posting, it is a single object that would
be associated with the handler, so per session. I'm not sure that we really
need another object, but what's one more pair of strings?
--- Noel
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:james-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:james-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
