I would agree... I would recommend we make this RC2. I definitely would like to avoid support emails saying "Oh you're running rc1? can you download that again in case you have the older rc1"?

--
Serge Knystautas
Loki Technologies
http://www.lokitech.com/

Danny Angus wrote:
+0
And .. I agree with Peters points
And .. I'll upload the build if its ready
And .. two version control points:

1/ IMO it helps if you change the name of the archive files in build.xml to include either a date or a version, and increment the version (either the minor number or the modifier a,b,rc, this avoids users confusion with any other builds. We should ensure builds have unique names
2/ Then TAG the HEAD with this command in the root of jakarta-james:
cvs tag <version> where version might be 2.1rc1
d.




I'd prefer that too, but there are other considerations. I'll be
willing to vote +1 on this provided that we can get the new milestone
build up and posted by 24 hours from the date of this email. I don't
have appropriate access to daedalus, so I can't guarantee that. If we
can get someone with that access to guarantee that, I've got no problem
with this fix. Otherwise I've got concerns that this will further push
out an already delayed release.

To speed the process, I've applied the patch, build a dist, and am
uploading to a public directory in my home directory on cvs.apache.org.
This will enable Danny or someone else just to copy it into the nightly
build directory.

If we can't make this timeframe I'll have to vote -1. Getting 2.1 out
the door is a very high priority, even if it means we leave some issues
unaddressed. This issue affects only a small segment of our user base.
If necessary, we'll issue that point release.

--Peter

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to