Charles, > Done
Thank you. > I think we can use the "Milestones" field to distinguish where in the > 2.1 cycle a bug is. This has only recently been activated, so there are > no entries for James. > > How about: > pre-alpha, alpha1, alpha2..., beta#, rc#, etc? Add "release" or 0 for the actual release and a set of minor version numbers (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) to deal with subsequent bugfix releases and I think that'd work just fine. > >A full revisit of the component list is probably appropriate early in the > >3.0 cycle. I'd rather we did this all at once, rather than piecemeal. > > > > > Fine by me Cool. Probably should be done at the same time as the version discussion. --Peter -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
