> when a command is read off the wire, it would be useful to confirm
> that no additional data is pending. If it is, a 5xx is immediately
> returned informing the client that they've sent a malformed command.
> I've got no real objection to that, provided it doesn't break any
> of the standard clients.
Please review the RFC's I mentioned earlier that deal with command
pipelining. I believe, from a cursory review, that your solution would
break them. I'm interested in SUPPORTING those RFCs when feasible.
I will object to any change (from anyone) that *prevents* an RFC from being
implemented, even an elective one.
--- Noel
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
