> > And to support that, if James will accept the message,
> > then we have James add some new X-header to the
> > message to indicate it was aggressively pipelined.
> I am not so sure about the idea of adding this new X-header. Isn't this
> value just intended for internal JAMES use?
I agree with Aaron that this sounds like a better use of a mail attribute,
which implies that this should be part of the v3 plans, which already
contain that notion.
--- Noel
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
