----- Original Message ----- From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Dec 27, 10:55 AM
> > > > Basically your message, by your own admission, is a > > > rehashing of old wounds without telling us what bugs > > > you think are present in the current code. > > > No it is not, it is documenting a certain irresponsibility on the part > > of a developer who has caused number of regressions and has not done > > any testing. > > Please read your sentence above. In fact, I encourage everyone to re-read > your sentence above. What was your intent? Was it to fix a problem or to > attack someone else's work? According to you, your intent was to document > alleged irresponsibilities on the part of a fellow Committer. No the intent was not to attack, but to make sure the developer focusses on testing what he commits. It would have been difficult to do that without giving examples. This thread should have been followed by a patch and that has been done. If it works all is good. I wish you stop reading between lines and concentrate on what I am saying not what you think I am saying. This is the 3rd issue that completly breaks NNTP Server that I have found so far. Testing is expected behaviour and saying it(even with examples) is not a personal attack. There is no need to get disturbed by it but the responsible developer should take it as an expressed concern. Harmeet
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
