> My personal opinion closely matches Matthew's. If you want to stabilize > development of 2.1, and encourage development of 3.0, then name 2.1 a > branch. If you want to encourage development of two divergent code > bases, then create two CVS trees.
I think we have a concensus then, both internally and incuding Sam's comment, for a branch? d. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
