Re: Excalibur/Cornerstone/James woes

[Stephen McConnell]

Danny Angus wrote:

1. a James releasse scenario - this is where you referencing

relased jars

2. a James build that is based on the current CVS of Avalon

based on Gump

I agree with 1, but not with 2.

I don't think it does James any good to treat the Avalon jar dependencies any different than we would other libraries. I also don't think it does Avalon any good in the long term.

I agree with Serge, despite our close relationship with avalon I think we *must* work with released software only,

But your not - your build against and distributing against an unrelease cornerstone package.

Cheers, Steve.

--

Stephen J. McConnell
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>