> I'd say that intent is quite clear on both sides. Let's resolve things > one by one as they come. I personally don't think that we should copy > James stuff in avalon-sandbox, and I'm sure that Stephen could be given > time-limited karma for changes he has to make.
Absolutely, we did the same for Paul H when he helped us with Phoenix. I would say that we need to hear on _this_ list, not everyone is actively following discussions on avalon-dev. > > Stephen has modified code that can be patched on James. It seems he > really needs a hand in resolving problems, and want you all to try the > changes and see if you can help. > This can be reasonably done by tagging current James and patching HEAD, > or making a branch and tagging that. the former is my prefrence, If the head was changing much, or fast, I'd agree with branching, but as its not I don't think a branch is necessary. Having Stephen break the head will also encourage us to help him fix it(!). d. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
