Yeah, there are two reasons I left it.. 1/ I don't have as strong an opinion about which we should settle on as others appear to and, 2/ either way exposing the Store(s) in Mailet is not necessary, as the MailetContext, not a seperate Store, handles the getRepository contract. Which is why it can handle both kinds without either store class at the mo.
d. > -----Original Message----- > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 25 January 2003 20:24 > To: James Developers List > Subject: RE: UsersStore moved from o.a.mailet to o.a.james.services? > > > Ah ... actually, I'd like to change that anyway. Something we can talk > about soon. I think I need to go back through my accumulated > messages, and > find out where we left off in organizaing our discussions for v3. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
