Jason,
When we looked at them before, the rough consensus appeared to be that we
prefered Forrest for the publishing tool, Maven for the rest. According to
Dion, we ought to be able to get the best of both because Maven can use
Forrest to generate the HTML.
Dion is still working on the project file for James, I believe. I'm really
looking forward to seeing the integrated result between Dion and Nicola's
work. Now that James is a TLP, and will have some formal sub-projects of
its own, I think these will be good tools to use.
In fact, Serge and I were discussing tests, and I am very much hoping that
we can add testing to our build process. I should ask Dion whether or not
it is possible for Maven to run tests that require running an external test
suite against a running server. In other words, first build the server,
then start the server, then run test programs that need to provide results.
--- Noel
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 16:04
To: James Developers List
Subject: RE: http://james.apache.org
On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 22:37, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Nicola,
>
> I prefer the new avalon-tigris skin, but I'd rather have the smaller font
> size used by Avalon or Centipede. And maybe punch the colors to match a
> color scheme drawn from the logo, perhaps our logo designer would like to
> provide some input on that score.
Can I ask why you are choosing to use Forrest instead of the
documentation mechanism provided by Maven? I'm just curious.
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tambora.zenplex.org
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
