Joe,
You might take a look at the code in proposals/imap2. I haven't looked at
the code. Basically, the various handlers all work by having a
handleSocket() method, which is coming from Avalon. I expect that we'll
have to change that eventually to complete the inversion in order to handle
both java.io and java.nio.
--- Noel
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Cheng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:56
To: 'James Developers List'
Subject: RE: imap
Noel-
I don't want to get bogged down in integration issues, but if there are
benign design decisions that I can make to make my code more
James-friendly I would certainly lean towards them. I don't really know
how to start this conversation though... is there a high-level design
document somewhere (or an e-mail thread) that I can read?
Thanks.
-jmc
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:45 AM
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: RE: imap
>
>
> Joe,
>
> There are various people working on the IMAP code, but no one
> is focusing on it as a primary contributor. Your
> contributions to James would be welcome. With respect to
> Avalon, the linkage is pretty clean, so it would be possible
> to share code if both projects followed a common model, which
> we can discuss.
>
> --- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
