My own opinion is very close to this, James could indeed be used as an sms/mail 
gateway but to avoid breaking James design principles it would need to be done in this 
way..

There should be a seperate app running as an sms gateway, in this case a modem driver 
capable of receiving and delivering sms messages to james. 

James would have to run a service capable of receiving spooling and processing 
incoming sms messages. It would also be capable of routing outgoing sms messages 
generated by any mechanism, internal or external, to this application, or preferably 
to any sms gateway using a published, or beter still a standard, protocol.

d

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivan Vecanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 29 March 2003 20:22
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: Re: the future of James
> 
> 
> 
> > The little black box I was talking about that is in our office, is an
> > Siemens MT 20  (I think it is called) it acts and behaves as a normal 
> > gsm-phone and can do everything a normal gsm-phone can do, but 
> it has no 
> > display or keyboard :-) it has only a serial connecton (rs232) and a 
> > headphone/mic connection..
> 
> Siemens M20 is a GSM modem and as you pointed out, you use it through AT
> commands or (if you want to avoid the low level mess) an 
> intermidary API like
> jSMS. I just started playing around with James and am not really 
> competent to
> say whether this should/will be supported or not, but IMHO this kind of
> interface doesn't fit into the James picture due to the following reasons:
> 
> - AT commands are not standardized. Most of the commands can be 
> used on all
> modems, but each modem has some specific commands. I don't think 
> an open source
> product would be capable of providing support for all/most of the modems
> available on the market.
> 
> - I see James as a server component capable of processing large amounts of
> traffic. GSM modems, which are today mainly used for SMS, can 
> send/receive one
> message in 5-10 seconds.
> 
> However, I think SMS capability (email-SMS gataway?) would be a very
> usefull fetaure in James, but I would see this implemented through SMPP as
> someone already pointed out. There are two open source projects 
> going on in this
> field:
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/smppsim/
> http://opensmpp.logica.com/
> 
> I hope this throws a little more light on the issue...
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to