I think the only problem was that harmeet & I jumped the gun and expressed our opinion with +1's
d. > -----Original Message----- > From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 05 June 2003 19:03 > To: James Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] New Committer, Mr. Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini > > > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > I did propose him. Harmeet and Danny both wanted to vote. > You commented > > that I was being too nice by proposing first, so I posted it > as a vote as > > you appeared to have requested. > > Noel, > > I'm sorry. I must not be sleeping or something. Here's what I think > happened: > > You did (effectively) propose Vincenzo, but I was looking for: > a) calling it a nomination. > b) a call for a vote. > > So your email didn't set a flag off in me, and I didn't realize this > from yesterday as the source of the confusion until just now. > > In light of the confusion, let's start counting 48 hours as of your > message today at 12:57:13 -0400 that mentions a call to vote. With my > +1, you've got 4 +1 and a passing nomination assuming nobody vetoes in > the next 46 hours. > > -- > Serge Knystautas > President > Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com > p. 301.656.5501 > e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
