I don't know.. X-Accept-Language?it would be useful, but what language header do you think about? Is this in a new RFC (new for me, at least :-) ) or is it an internal convention?
Thinking about this some more, I'm wondering if instead of tying it to bundles or XML resources, just reference one of the new attributes that are coming in 2.2. This would enable the mailet developer to populate attributes in an early mailet and then refer to them in subsequent parameter definitions.. This is more flexible because the mailet developer could determine what/how he would like the attributes to be set.
Jim
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
