If you set up all repositories to work on the database except for the spool
repository, which should go to the file system or to separate databases for
each instance of James, it should actually work. Or am I wrong?
Cheers,
Thomas
----- Original Message -----
From: "Serge Knystautas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 9:33 PM
Subject: Re: Can 2 instances of JAMES share the same database?
> There's a problem with the spool managers as locks are handled within each
> given instance. This means it's possible that a message could arrive in
the
> spool repository, and both mail engines would try to process it. Aside
from
> this locking issue, I think things would be fine.
>
> Serge Knystautas
> Loki Technologies
> http://www.lokitech.com/
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 3:23 PM
> Subject: Can 2 instances of JAMES share the same database?
>
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are thinking of using JAMES to handle SMTP traffic on a messaging
> server,
> > but would like to be able to have it running on two machines for
> redundancy
> > (using a hardware load balancer). If I configure it to save it's user
> info
> > and message stores in an Oracle database, does anyone know if there are
> any
> > issues with both instances accessing the database at the same time?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bruce
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
