Thomas Jachmann had an interesting idea about keeping the spool
repositories separate (by either keeping them on the local disks,
or pointing at different tables in the db).
Do you think this would successfully avoid the locking problem?
Thanks,
Bruce
-----Original Message-----
From: Oki DZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 4:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Can 2 instances of JAMES share the same database?
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Serge Knystautas wrote:
> There's a problem with the spool managers as locks are handled within each
> given instance. This means it's possible that a message could arrive in
the
> spool repository, and both mail engines would try to process it. Aside
from
> this locking issue, I think things would be fine.
And due to the locking issue, you may have the messages get sent twice.
Oki
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
