'kill' aborts any transfer, but the sending mail server will treat this as a
temporary condition and retry since it would not receive a confirmation of
receipt notice.
The next version does not have a more graceful shutdown method, although I'm
pushing to get the next version released this month. Like I said, mail
won't get lost or corrupted by a 'kill', so it hasn't been a high priority.
It is more of a priority though so we can gracefully restart without having
to stop and start the process.
Serge Knystautas
Loki Technologies
http://www.lokitech.com/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Takashi Kawachi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 4:14 PM
Subject: Re: What JAMES version recommended?
> I'm trying james 1.2.1. It can be considered to be enough for me if
> james' shutdown is done safely (without lost any incoming mail).
> I shutdown james by kill command,and i think it's not safety. Is my
> idea right?
>
> I read mailing list archive that next version of james has a method of
> safety shutdown. I want to know when it's released?
>
> thanks.
>
> At Thu, 9 Aug 2001 15:39:38 -0400,
> Serge Knystautas wrote:
> > Depends how comfortable you are testing and tweaking an installation.
The
> > nightly builds are just whatever is in CVS that night, which isn't
changing
> > significantly at this point. If you want something that will work and
be
> > relatively straight forward, use 1.2.1. If you feel up to having to
figure
> > a lot more out, you can try the nightly build/CVS version.
> >
> > Serge Knystautas
> > Loki Technologies
> > http://www.lokitech.com/
>
> --
> Takashi Kawachi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
