...I don't know how to say...but now that the time is right, the date is wrong. It says Jan 1st 2001 (01/01/2001)....I only had the time in mind when I first tested it....
---------------------------------- Mirco Bharpalania GMD German National Research Center for Information Technology. Dolivostr. 15 D-64293 Darmstadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Montag, 1. Oktober 2001 14:05 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Receipt Offset by One Hour Thanks goes to Danny... he came up with the patch. Glad it solved the problem. Serge Knystautas Loki Technologies http://www.lokitech.com/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mirco Bharpalania" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 8:03 AM Subject: RE: Receipt Offset by One Hour > Serge, > thank you very much for the patch. It did fix the time stamp problem. Great. > > > > ---------------------------------- > Mirco Bharpalania > > GMD > German National Research Center for Information Technology. > Dolivostr. 15 > D-64293 Darmstadt > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -----Original Message----- > From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Montag, 24. September 2001 16:36 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Receipt Offset by One Hour > > > Mirco, Danny, Brant, (anyone else?) > > Thanks for spotting this, and I'm sorry for doubting the validity of the > report! > > I'll apply Danny's patch later today to the main branch of CVS and hopefully > that will do the trick. > > Serge Knystautas > Loki Technologies > http://www.lokitech.com/ > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Danny Angus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 9:26 AM > Subject: RE: Receipt Offset by One Hour > > > > I'm now seeing this on the version from CVS, on the SMTP welcome message > > (telnet localhost 25) > > I get my time with no offset mentioned, but during summer time it should > be > > +0100 > > Hmm, I'm looking at RFC822DateFormat > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 2:11 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: Receipt Offset by One Hour > > > > > > > > > I have to agree with Danny that you may want to check your > > > system... I also > > > don't mean to offend, but James has been downloaded 3000 times a month > for > > > almost a year now (and used by us in EST for 2 years now), and would be > > > surprised if this serious a bug hadn't been noticed before. > > > > > > Serge Knystautas > > > Loki Technologies > > > http://www.lokitech.com/ > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Danny Angus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 7:57 AM > > > Subject: RE: Receipt Offset by One Hour > > > > > > > > > > are both your machines (server and client) set to the same > > > zone, daylight, > > > > and time. > > > > Please don't take too much offence, I think that OE uses local system > > > time, > > > > not the time on the email for receipt time, and servers are > > > sometimes set > > > to > > > > not use daylight saving, as timestamps and logs can become confusing. > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Mirco Bharpalania [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 10:57 AM > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: RE: Receipt Offset by One Hour > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When I use the patch from the directory, still the received time > > > > > is one hour > > > > > ahead. The patch has version 0.9 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------- > > > > > Mirco Bharpalania > > > > > > > > > > GMD > > > > > German National Research Center for Information Technology. > > > > > Dolivostr. 15 > > > > > D-64293 Darmstadt > > > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Donnerstag, 13. September 2001 03:19 > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: Re: Receipt Offset by One Hour > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Again, it's in CVS. You can browse to that package here: > > > > > http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-james/src/java/org/apache/ja > > > > > mes/util/ > > > > > > > > > > Serge Knystautas > > > > > Loki Technologies > > > > > http://www.lokitech.com/ > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: Brant Corenson > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 5:55 PM > > > > > Subject: Re: Receipt Offset by One Hour > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would appreciate it if you would post or send me the patch. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Brant > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: Serge Knystautas > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:35 PM > > > > > Subject: Re: Receipt Offset by One Hour > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Someone just sent me a patch directly on this exact topic. I'm > > > > > pretty sure > > > > > this has been corrected in CVS, although I've been using it for a > > > > > while and > > > > > personally hadn't noticed the problem (I'm in EST). > > > > > > > > > > Serge Knystautas > > > > > Loki Technologies > > > > > http://www.lokitech.com/ > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: Brant Corenson > > > > > To: James-user > > > > > Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 7:47 PM > > > > > Subject: Receipt Offset by One Hour > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've loaded James and it appears to work except for one > > > problem. When I > > > > > send a test message, the received time is one hour ahead of the sent > > > time. > > > > > The sent time is accurate. I'm in the Pacific Time Zone. > > > > > > > > > > It appears that there is a time zone problem caused by the SMTP > module > > > not > > > > > properly accounting for daylight savings time. Am I correct? > > > > > > > > > > Has anyone seen this problem? Is there a solution or do I have > > > > > to live with > > > > > it until another iteration of the software comes out? > > > > > > > > > > My test configuration consists of a client running Outlook > > > Express under > > > > > Windows 2000 and a server that contains James, Apache, and > > > Windows 2000 > > > > > Server. For my test, I simply echo a message to myself over the > local > > > > > network. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Brant --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
