I don't think there's any danger of that, I understand that it was intended to allow people to build remote administration into other apps, and I'm tempted, but too busy, to use it as the basis for a GUI admin app. d.
> -----Original Message----- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrew C. Oliver > Sent: 18 August 2002 15:36 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: RMI remote manager > > > Just for the record (as a dumb user) I'm totally against making the RMI > manager replace the standard one. There are MANY MANY reasons why (I > can go through them if they are not obvious) > > -Andy > > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > Danny, > > > > I might have missed it, but I thought that I had diff'd the > assembly files > > without seeing a problem. > > > > --- Noel > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Danny Angus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 18:42 > > To: James Users List > > Subject: RE: RMI remote manager > > > > > > I don't think paul attempted anything in proposals > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>Sent: 16 August 2002 21:47 > >>To: James Users List; Yegor A. Yenikeev > >>Subject: RE: RMI remote manager > >> > >> > >>Did you pickup everything from the James CVS, including the new Phoenix? > >>They dropped Block in favor of Component. Paul Hammant updated > the James > >>tree back on June 3. > >> > >> --- Noel > > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
