Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> Just clarifying.
> 
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> 
>>> Just for the record (as a dumb user) I'm totally against making the RMI
>>> manager replace the standard one.
>>
>>
>>
>> Where was a suggestion that would be done?  The most likely 
>> "replacement" is
>> based upon JMX, since Phoenix is now JMX-enabled, and that hasn't even 
>> been
>> discussed yet.

I'm quite confident that it'll be based on JMX.
With the latest Phoenix it'll be easy to do it, and it will be 
consistent with the management stuff of other Phoenix apps.

-- 
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to