Will do. This possibility finally occurred to me just prior to posting to the group. I'll post back on the subject (hopefully, to close things out) tomorrow after I "deep clean" the server setup.
Thanks again, Ben -----Original Message----- From: Peter M. Goldstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 4:15 PM To: 'James Users List' Subject: RE: The SMTP AUTH issue Ben, You've got an old version. The command received methods are getting printed out under "INFO" not "DEBUG". I don't know what you've got misconfigured, but at about the same time we made the change to fix SMTP AUTH we also changed the received commands to print out at a debug level. Since your log shows them at info, that means you've got an old version. Please double check your configuration and remove any older versions of James you may have installed. --Peter > -----Original Message----- > From: Clark, Ben [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 2:06 PM > To: James Users List > Subject: RE: The SMTP AUTH issue > > Peter, here's the relevant section of the smtpserver.log file. > > INFO 2002-08-25 23:36:25.228 [smtpserv] (): Command received: EHLO > [192.168.1.10] > INFO 2002-08-25 23:36:29.966 [smtpserv] (): Command received: AUTH > PLAIN AGJjbGFyawB3YWxwMGwz > ERROR 2002-08-25 23:36:29.967 [smtpserv] (): AUTH method PLAIN > AGJjbFGyaw3BYWwxMGwz is an unrecognized authentication type > INFO 2002-08-25 23:36:30.997 [smtpserv] (): Command received: QUIT > > This sure looks like the old SMTP AUTH error. I'm just not sure how its > still there. > > I have the latest milestone build. When the server starts it is showing > James 2.1a1 as the version. If the AUTH error has been fixed in this > version, is it possible that I am somehow starting the new version of the > server, but drawing on the old smtpserver.jar file through an error in my > JAVA_HOME or something? > > Any suggestions would be appreciated. > > Ben > > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter M. Goldstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 2:05 PM > To: 'James Users List' > Subject: RE: The SMTP AUTH issue > > > > Ben, > > It's been implemented in the current code base (latest CVS head and the > recent milestone build). I suggest you turn the SMTP server logging to > debug mode and send the logs to the list for general examination. > > --Peter > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Clark, Ben [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 11:54 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: The SMTP AUTH issue > > > > I was wading through the archives and found Peter's fix for this and > > assumed that has been implemented in James 2.1a1 but I'm still having > > problems with some clients (Ximian's Evolution and Netscape 4.72-ish > > Mail). > > > > Has the SMTP AUTH fix (Bug 6340) been implemented in 2.1a1? > > > > If not, can anyone tell me how I can figure out where to paste the > fix? It > > looks like the doAUTH code has already been patched, but my Java is > weak > > enough that I could be wrong. > > > > If the bug has been fixed, does anyone know why these clients might > still > > fail? Eudora and Outlook Express work fine. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ben Clark > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:james-user- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:james-user- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:james-user- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:james-user- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
