OK ... what is the "a1" for, as opposed to James 2.1-2002-09-19? Just
trying to understand the rationale behind the labeling.
--- Noel
-----Original Message-----
From: Danny Angus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 14:18
To: James Users List
Subject: RE: James 2.1a1 refresh
thats what the datestamp is for
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 24 September 2002 18:57
> To: James Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: James 2.1a1 refresh
>
>
> > Also, please note that the current james2.1a1-2002-09-19 download is
> corrupt and
> > should be avoided until it is replaced with a newer, corrected version.
>
> Oh my ... that was the jar juggling version? Yes, please let's get that
> updated!
>
> And shouldn't the 2.1aX number get incremented so that we don't
> have to ask
> WHICH 2.1a1 version they are using? :-)
>
> --- Noel
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
