> The processing is not atomic, therefore an oportunity for processing to
> terminate abruptly with mail "between" states will *always* be present.
> James deals with this by re-starting processing from the last recorded
> state, allowing the possibility for some mail to pass through some
> processing twice.
It occured to me that this window can be minimized by the simple process of
putting a non-idempotent mailet in its own processor, or having it set the
state. Actually, I realized earlier today how to completely eliminate the
window within a custom mailet under carefully controlled circumstances, but
the mailet has to be specially written to do it. Not something that would
generally be done.
--- Noel
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
