> You allowed infinite connections, but there are other resources, such as > threads, that you did not change. It appears that your threadpool was > exhausted. > > --- Noel >
I suspected that, in fact i should (and will) limit back such number of connections. My point is: was it some kind of attack? Was it a denial-of-service attack? In the latter case, to avoid service disruption, would it be better to increase or decrease the connections/threads etc? More generally, has anyone in the James comunity been thinking about the problem of being attacked by a very high number of requests? Or even has been attacked? Perhaps there could exist some auto-protection inside James, for example not allowing more than a certain number of *open* connections/allocated threads, or more than a certain number of connections/allocated threads *per-unit-of-time* to the same IP. Vincenzo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
