> My point is: was it some kind of attack? Was it a denial-of-service
attack?
No idea.
> In the latter case, to avoid service disruption, would it be better to
> increase or decrease the connections/threads etc?
If you had kept the original distribution settings, James would have simply
rejected additional connections, rather than exhaust the thread pool.
For James v3, there will likely be support to limit the # of simultaneous
connections from a single IP (or perhaps from a network).
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
