----- Original Message ----- From: Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Feb 14, 4:08 PM > Perhaps a general solution ... could be to have James require always an > authentication from the sender and, in case of failure, block only messages > going to non-local users like now to avoid open relay spamming, but allowing > in any case matchers and mailets to check if there has been a successful > authentication/verification. Does it make sense? >
It makes sense to me and that is how I have one mail server setup(non-james). James currently has spool pipeline, but in the next version it plans to have handler interceptors. This should allow what you are suggesting to be done at the handler level. BTW. you may want to use 2.1.1 released version for authenticated access. It has smtp auth fixes. Harmeet
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
