> Perhaps a general solution (but probably needing a change in the > James code > and so outside of my reach) could be to have James require always an > authentication from the sender and, in case of failure, block > only messages > going to non-local users like now to avoid open relay spamming, > but allowing > in any case matchers and mailets to check if there has been a successful > authentication/verification. Does it make sense?
I'm not sure that that would work, other mail transport agents connecting to james would give up if james asked for authentication and they had no credentials. Unfortunately it is the combination of sender and recipient which is used to determine whether authentication is required. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
