> It seems to me that the work you did is useful even just for that reason. > The more places you find that need to be changed when Japhar is ported, the > easier it gets to port in the future. At the very least, patches would be > useful in order to find out what functions had to be modified. > Ok. I have not yet started to work on the 0.08 release, but the port would be cleaner. It will be made available on some web site as soon it works. > A porting guide might be a good idea, too ... If i have time, i will try to write a few lines. --Christophe
- Re: Patch for Japhar 0.08 on Sparc Christoph Toshok
- Re: Patch for Japhar 0.08 on Sparc Christophe Lizzi
- Re: Patch for Japhar 0.08 on Sparc Chris Toshok
- Re: Patch for Japhar 0.08 on Sparc Christophe Lizzi
- Re: Patch for Japhar 0.08 on Sparc Chris Toshok
- Re: Patch for Japhar 0.08 on Sparc Christophe Lizzi
- Re: Patch for Japhar 0.08 on Sparc Petter Reinholdtsen
- Re: Patch for Japhar 0.08 on Sparc Christophe Lizzi
- RE: Patch for Japhar 0.08 on Sparc John Keiser
- Re: Patch for Japhar 0.08 on Sparc Christoph Toshok
- RE: Patch for Japhar 0.08 on Sparc Christophe Lizzi
- RE: Patch for Japhar 0.08 on Sparc Todd Shutts
