On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, jon * wrote:
> > (speaking of which, since 1.0b2 seems pretty stable feature- and
> > bug-wise, why not just call it 1.0 and move to 1.1 for main development?
>
> I would like to try to do another beta sometime this week.
I think this is a great idea -- while I'd like to fix some outstanding
problems first, there are some bug fixes which would be useful to people.
The problem w/ DSOs in particular...
Release early and often, after all.
What we call it is of less concern to me, but there are some significant
problems which I'd hope we can fix before calling it 1.0. IMO, we need to
work on filling in all the details before adding features / increasing the
complexity (which may be what 1.1 implies to some people).
It may be less fun to fix bugs than to implement new features, but it's
more important (IMNSHO).
Ed
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://www.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
