> I think this is a great idea -- while I'd like to fix some outstanding
> problems first, there are some bug fixes which would be useful to people.
> The problem w/ DSOs in particular...
+1
> Release early and often, after all.
+1
> What we call it is of less concern to me, but there are some significant
> problems which I'd hope we can fix before calling it 1.0. IMO, we need to
> work on filling in all the details before adding features / increasing the
> complexity (which may be what 1.1 implies to some people).
Yes, there aren't that many outstanding "bugs" that have been reported that
have not been fixed already. What I mean by "bugs" are showstoppers that
prevents people from using the software.
I agree that I would like to see a jserv start/stop script for manual mode.
I think that the unix side of this should be pretty easy. I'm not sure at
all how to do the win32 side of this.
> It may be less fun to fix bugs than to implement new features, but it's
> more important (IMNSHO).
Unfortunately, that is 100% true. The same can be said about documentation.
-jon
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://www.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
