> So it is indeed the case that stat was leaving r->finfo in an invalid
> state; when I described this & suggested a patch, one of the people in the
> Apache Group decided it wasn't a good idea to trust the value in r->finfo
> after a failed stat call, and applied the following (related) patch:
This is now in the FAQ...
<http://java.apache.org/faq/?file=158>
thanks for following up on it Ed!
-jon
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
READ THE FAQ!!!! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
