[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13181979#comment-13181979
 ] 

Andreas Veithen commented on AXIS-2864:
---------------------------------------

Axis 1.4 uses the naming conventions imposed by JAX-RPC 1.1. I guess that Axis 
1.1 conforms to a previous or draft version of JAX-RPC or doesn't implement 
JAX-RPC at all. One could probably make the XML Name -> Java name mappings 
configurable to provide (limited) compatibility with previous Axis versions. 
Can you give a more detailed account of the differences that cause your issue?
                
> Migrating  AXIS 1.4  creating new stubs of classes  that are not compatible 
> with  AX1.1
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AXIS-2864
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2864
>             Project: Axis
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: WSDL processing
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.1, 1.4
>         Environment: Redhat AIX/Linux 5.2
>            Reporter: Manouchehr Shahrava
>              Labels: AXIS1.4, GIOM, migration
>
>   Axis 1.4 generates stubs which differ very significantly from Axis 1.1 ( 
> The changes are in naming convention of stubs and in the structure of the 
> stub themselves. e.g some classes are no longer being generated, and all _ 
> (underscores) in names are gone by default.  We can not migrate our app to 
> AXIS 1.4

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to