DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31841>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31841 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-05 21:09 ------- One more note on this. I think conforming to the new Weight protocol, i.e. eliminating the searcher field from BooleanWeight, BooleanWeight2, and MultiPhraseWeight, is quite important. This is because the Weight is now sent to RemoteSearchables instead of the Query. If Weights have a searcher field, then this could be quite expensive. Chuck -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
