On Tuesday 26 April 2005 21:09, Erik Hatcher wrote: > I don't know.... would it? ÂI have no preference, though it seems ok to > me to simply return null since this is the toString method. ÂFor a > Document, the toString is only useful for debugging anyway.
Yes, and during debugging it would be especially confusing to just hide the exception. Sure, people will see that there's a problem with a "null" document, but then why not show the exception directly? Regards Daniel -- http://www.danielnaber.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
