DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35518>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35518 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-28 00:46 ------- Created an attachment (id=15541) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15541&action=view) JUnit test Hi David, Thanks for this. I've still not taken the time to add proper phrase/span query support to the current sandbox highlighter so this will definitely be useful to folks. I've adapted portions of the existing highlighter's Junit test to work on your highlighter code and have attached it here. There are some issues I've noted on a first pass over the code and these are illustrated in the Junit tests. Some of them may be deliberate design choices (eg no slop factor support) but others I'd rate as real issues eg lack of fieldname for use with analyzers. Going forward I think it would be useful to try retain some of the features of the existing highlighter (eg IDF weighted fragment scoring, fragSizes defined in bytes) and merge with your phrase-highlighting features.Adding span query support would be good too. What I'm less clear on right now is how this is best achieved. Thanks again, Mark -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
