Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Could someone enumerate what needs to be done before 2.0 is released. : From following this thread, it was stated that 2.0 was 1.9 with : deprecations removed. : Recently it appears to be becoming much more than that. I believe Doug's suggestion was to hold off just long enough to fix any egregious bugs, or apply any "safe" patches for bugs that have allready been fixed but not yet applied. the "2.0 is the same as 1.9 but with deprecations removed" policy was about features, but if there are bugs that can be fixed easily, let's fix them. at the monent, there are two Jira issues with a "Fix" version of 2.0 still unresolved: LUCENE-556 and LUCENE-546 .. presumably, unless someone marks any other bugs as "Fix for 2.0" 2.0 can be released once those bugs have been fixed, or sooner if it's decided that nbo one has the time to fix those (or the existing patches aren't safe to apply hastily)
Both of these are unassigned. 546 has an attached patch. 556 mentions a work around.
Well, I am looking forward to someone else taking this on;) and getting 2.0 out the door!
...or at least, that's the way i udnerstand it ... i'm no policy maker. -Hoss
I think this is in keeping with what was said here. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
