This sounds reasonable to me. I feel bad about Andi and PyLucene, but it
sounds like GCJ(X) will soon be up-to-date (the link Andi sent was from early
February). Discussion done or?
Otis
----- Original Message ----
From: Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 7:12:15 PM
Subject: Re: Lucene and Java 1.5
: important new facilities. Repeating my earlier question, why should a
: platform that is 2 years behind for java expect to be at the latest and
: greatest level for lucene? I'd propose 2.0 (+ branched patches) be the
: 1.4 release distribution, with 2.1 free to move up to 1.5.
I would ammend that proposal slightly...
1a) Lucene Core 2.0.* releases garuntee java1.4 compatibility
1b) Lucene Contrib modules in 2.0.* releases are free to require any java
version they choose.
2a) Lucene Core 2.1.* release garuntee java1.5 compatibility.
2b) Lucene Contrib modules in 2.1.* releases are free to require any java
version they choose.
-Hoss
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
