[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-657?page=comments#action_12443946 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-657: -------------------------------------
Making the class non-final is fine. As far as changing members to protected, I'm not opposed to opening something up a little more so the very expert users don't have to copy the class (although that is often an option). In return, those expert users shouldn't complain if the internals change ;-) > FuzzyQuery should not be final > ------------------------------ > > Key: LUCENE-657 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-657 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Search > Environment: all platforms > Reporter: Andreas Neumann > Assigned To: Steven Parkes > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 2.1 > > Attachments: fuzzy.patch > > > I am trying to extend the FuzzyQuery to further filter the TermEnum. (I am > indexing stem forms and original forms, but I only want to match original > forms with a fuzzy term, otherwise I get to much noise). However, FuzzyQuery > is a final class and I cannot extend it. > As discussed in the mailing list > (http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/38756), we want to > make the private variables and inner classes protected. > I am attaching a patch for FuzzyQuery.java that implements this. I ran all > unit tests and they passed without errors. > Andreas. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
